Hi All,
This post was written by Randy Dillard and Matt Bennet I am just moving it from comments to a post. We had some technical problems getting it posted. Please be patient with us as we are just starting out with the Blogg. We will have the technical issues sorted out soon.
Chris-
SOE Colloquium
Summary: Community Opposition to State-Mandated Educational Management in a
Large Urban School District in the Midwest. -Dr. Maiyoua Vang-
Urban
education does not exist in a vacuum:
Dr. Vang
established that educators cannot analyze the problems of urban education
independently, but must examine it through its symbiotic relationship with
suburban education. To study urban education you must also acknowledge and
study the surrounding exosystems, which envelop both suburban and urban
centers.
Dr. Vang
argues that researchers and educators are not asking the right questions to
enable those in poverty to break the vicious cycle and transcend the social
condition they are born in. She directly points to a form of structural amnesia
that pervades the discourse currently. She asserts that this structural amnesia
allows us as educators, as leaders, and as parents in many instances to ignore
the educational policies that are dishonest and more importantly detrimental to
the children most affected by those policies.
It is of her
opinion that if we are going to be serious about education reform then we must
also be serious about acknowledging, addressing, and combating the structural
factors that are directly impacting the physiological and psychological makeup
of children living in urban settings. Education needs to be examined through
the context in which it is delivered; education reform without contextual
reform just brings us more of the same.
Socioeconomic
factors (SES) as predictors of the MEAP:
Dr. Vang cited
Marylone’s study which closely examined SES factors as predictor of MEAP. Using
a prediction formula, Maylone, with good accuracy, predicted whether SES would
pass the MEAP. Maylone’s study showed that the factors that measure wealth
distribution are extremely powerful in predicting standardized testing
achievement. Dr. Vang prodded us to think more critically about the extra
contextual factors that contribute to individual and familial economic
situations and how in turn it impacts things such as standardized tests scores.
Poverty matters! Consequently, she implores researchers and educators to listen
to the data and follow suit of some of the other social sciences.
Prison-industrial
complex in the United States:
A portion of the presentation highlighted the
significant problem of minority incarceration in the United States. The United
States is one of the most highly advanced countries in the world yet has the
highest incarceration rates. Ironically, as crime was leveling off in the late
70s, early 80s, incarceration began to soar in the United States. She went on
to pose a rhetorical question to the group: What is our excuse? She then
continued to point out the correlation between the surplus of “disposable
bodies” in “disposable cities” like Detroit and the proliferation of political
institutions set up to handle these “surplus bodies”. Cities like Detroit are
fueling incarceration rates, as citizens, who lack skills and are denied social
mobility, are turning to the underground economy (i.e., drug trade) as a means
of survival. What is the solution though? The solution is delivering real
school reform and providing urban students’ education that enfranchises, rather
than disfranchises.
The Baltimore
Algebra Project – An example of grassroots organizing:
Dr. Vang
discussed the Baltimore Algebra Project in detail and we had the opportunity to
hear from three young men (Trey, Tim, and Jamal) working with the project as
they conference called in live to join our discussion. The Baltimore Algebra
Project is an organization of civic minded young men and women who are
campaigning for real school reform within their own communities, under the
banner “No Education/No Life”. These three young men discussed the underfunding
and discrimination that exists in Baltimore Public Schools. Through civil
disobedience and petition, the Baltimore Algebra Project wants the state of
Maryland to be held accountable and pay restitution, for what they believe, are
unconstitutional acts. The Baltimore Algebra project is providing a voice to a
segment of the population who have, historically, been silenced. Their belief
is that real education reform must occur within, rather than from an outsiders,
who are disconnected from the population and students they are trying to serve.
As Trey articulated to us while on the call “top down decision making is not
resonating with people in the Baltimore neighborhoods.” In their opinion if
officials are unable or unwilling to authentically connect with the needs and
wishes of the constituents in which they were elected or appointed to serve
then these officials are really not serving a purpose at all. Students deserve
leaders and decision making that acknowledges their voice, context, and
delivers education that meets their needs. Until this occurs, education in
Baltimore continues to restrict social mobility, is fragmenting the community,
and is not providing students the skills to attain high quality jobs.
Current state
of education in Detroit:
To conclude
the presentation Dr. Vang brought the discussion full circle and examined the
current state of education in the city of Detroit. She discussed how a
perpetual cycle of poor decisions and mismanagement has led Detroit to its
current set of circumstances. A historical timeline was used to help those
attending the presentation clearly see the sequence of decisions and their
accumulating effects over time. She worries that privatization of education
will continue to fragment the community and silence the voices of students and
the electorate. Similar to the Baltimore Algebra Project, students, parents,
local grassroots leaders, etc need to take back their voice and advocate for
the schools and education that they deserve.
QUESTIONS to
start our discussion:
1)
In
light of the fiscal realities is the movement toward more charter schools
and/or closing the doors on public school facilities the best remedy for
solving some of the most crippling educational problems in urban centers like
Detroit?
2)
What
are the ramifications, if any, on the social, political, and cultural capital
of the neighborhoods left behind after public schools are closed in their
area?
3)
Drawing
from your own personal and professional experience respond to or expound upon
one of the topics either in this post or from the the video sent to us by Dr
Vang http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04CaLMODRuM
Randy and Matt,
ReplyDeleteThanks for getting us started on this discussion. I think that you have provided a nice summary of the talk. I also appreciate your willingness to be the first to post to the Blog.
I wanted to respond to your second question. I thought that Dr. Vang made a compelling case that the financial resources of the Detroit Public School system had been stripped from the community by external groups. What I was left wondering was are these the only resources that were stripped from the community. I think that a case could be made that the the chartering movement, and the external control of the curriculum as well as other external non-school based pressures have also worked to strip some of the social and cultural capital from the communities. I raise this point as a question not as a statement. I think that this would be an area of scholarship worth exploring.
I also thought that the presentation with the students from the Baltimore Algebra Project demonstrated that the process of organizing and advocating for more equitable just schools has a positive impact on the individual students. Trey, Tim, and Jamal were examples of the benefit of engaging students. What I wanted to know more about was what was the impact on the community. Can organizing around the community school be a source of community reengagement and community revitalization? By advocating for schools can communities reclaim their own space and their own cultural, social, and financial capital?
Again, thanks for starting the conversation. I look forward to hearing more voices.
Chris-
Thank you Matt and Randy for the post. I did not get to attend Dr. Vang's discussion, but I just watched the video attachment and it was powerful. I think it demonstrates, as well as the summary you provided above, that many significant changes start from the bottom up or "grassroots movements." If we think back into historical events, we can link significant movements to small, central starting points. Within our own school districts, even if in the suburban districts, decisions that have made an impact often start with students or parents protesting what they want for their schools. For example, when cutting extra curricular activities, our district had a strong parent bottom-up movement that made its way to the decision makers. On a larger scale, we know that it is very difficult for teachers and students to relate to decisions made from those higher up, many of whom are not affiliated with education. This is very true during this past election year. As educators, and future decision makers, we need to be aware of the power of bottom-up movements of change and realize that if the people cannot relate, then there will not be a common-understanding in decisions themselves or why they are made.
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing the video. I was moved and look forward to meeting Dr. Vanh on another occasion to hear her thoughts on this and many other issues.
Tina
Dr. Vang, I apologize for the typo in your name above. I am also getting used to the blogsite and am not sure if I can edit a posted comment on here.
DeleteI was fortunate to attend Dr. Vang's talk which I found to be very provocative. She provided us with a lot of food for thought. I was particularly struck by the students who participated as well by phone.
ReplyDeleteI think that the case of Detroit is not unusual given the politics that has dominated the city for the past twenty (or perhaps more) years. I'm still thinking about all of this and welcome the discussion. Perhaps I'll check back in later this week.