Sunday, November 11, 2012

Vang SOE Colloquium Response


Hi All,

This post was written by Randy Dillard and Matt Bennet I am just moving it from comments to a post. We had some technical problems getting it posted.  Please be patient with us as we are just starting out with the Blogg. We will have the technical issues sorted out soon. 

Chris-

SOE Colloquium Summary: Community Opposition to State-Mandated Educational Management in a Large Urban School District in the Midwest. -Dr. Maiyoua Vang-


Urban education does not exist in a vacuum:



Dr. Vang established that educators cannot analyze the problems of urban education independently, but must examine it through its symbiotic relationship with suburban education. To study urban education you must also acknowledge and study the surrounding exosystems, which envelop both suburban and urban centers. 



Dr. Vang argues that researchers and educators are not asking the right questions to enable those in poverty to break the vicious cycle and transcend the social condition they are born in. She directly points to a form of structural amnesia that pervades the discourse currently. She asserts that this structural amnesia allows us as educators, as leaders, and as parents in many instances to ignore the educational policies that are dishonest and more importantly detrimental to the children most affected by those policies. 



It is of her opinion that if we are going to be serious about education reform then we must also be serious about acknowledging, addressing, and combating the structural factors that are directly impacting the physiological and psychological makeup of children living in urban settings. Education needs to be examined through the context in which it is delivered; education reform without contextual reform just brings us more of the same. 



Socioeconomic factors (SES) as predictors of the MEAP:



Dr. Vang cited Marylone’s study which closely examined SES factors as predictor of MEAP. Using a prediction formula, Maylone, with good accuracy, predicted whether SES would pass the MEAP. Maylone’s study showed that the factors that measure wealth distribution are extremely powerful in predicting standardized testing achievement. Dr. Vang prodded us to think more critically about the extra contextual factors that contribute to individual and familial economic situations and how in turn it impacts things such as standardized tests scores. Poverty matters! Consequently, she implores researchers and educators to listen to the data and follow suit of some of the other social sciences. 

Prison-industrial complex in the United States:

A portion of the presentation highlighted the significant problem of minority incarceration in the United States. The United States is one of the most highly advanced countries in the world yet has the highest incarceration rates. Ironically, as crime was leveling off in the late 70s, early 80s, incarceration began to soar in the United States. She went on to pose a rhetorical question to the group: What is our excuse? She then continued to point out the correlation between the surplus of “disposable bodies” in “disposable cities” like Detroit and the proliferation of political institutions set up to handle these “surplus bodies”. Cities like Detroit are fueling incarceration rates, as citizens, who lack skills and are denied social mobility, are turning to the underground economy (i.e., drug trade) as a means of survival. What is the solution though? The solution is delivering real school reform and providing urban students’ education that enfranchises, rather than disfranchises. 



The Baltimore Algebra Project – An example of grassroots organizing: 



Dr. Vang discussed the Baltimore Algebra Project in detail and we had the opportunity to hear from three young men (Trey, Tim, and Jamal) working with the project as they conference called in live to join our discussion. The Baltimore Algebra Project is an organization of civic minded young men and women who are campaigning for real school reform within their own communities, under the banner “No Education/No Life”. These three young men discussed the underfunding and discrimination that exists in Baltimore Public Schools. Through civil disobedience and petition, the Baltimore Algebra Project wants the state of Maryland to be held accountable and pay restitution, for what they believe, are unconstitutional acts. The Baltimore Algebra project is providing a voice to a segment of the population who have, historically, been silenced. Their belief is that real education reform must occur within, rather than from an outsiders, who are disconnected from the population and students they are trying to serve. As Trey articulated to us while on the call “top down decision making is not resonating with people in the Baltimore neighborhoods.” In their opinion if officials are unable or unwilling to authentically connect with the needs and wishes of the constituents in which they were elected or appointed to serve then these officials are really not serving a purpose at all. Students deserve leaders and decision making that acknowledges their voice, context, and delivers education that meets their needs. Until this occurs, education in Baltimore continues to restrict social mobility, is fragmenting the community, and is not providing students the skills to attain high quality jobs. 



Current state of education in Detroit:



To conclude the presentation Dr. Vang brought the discussion full circle and examined the current state of education in the city of Detroit. She discussed how a perpetual cycle of poor decisions and mismanagement has led Detroit to its current set of circumstances. A historical timeline was used to help those attending the presentation clearly see the sequence of decisions and their accumulating effects over time. She worries that privatization of education will continue to fragment the community and silence the voices of students and the electorate. Similar to the Baltimore Algebra Project, students, parents, local grassroots leaders, etc need to take back their voice and advocate for the schools and education that they deserve. 



QUESTIONS to start our discussion:



1)    In light of the fiscal realities is the movement toward more charter schools and/or closing the doors on public school facilities the best remedy for solving some of the most crippling educational problems in urban centers like Detroit?



2)    What are the ramifications, if any, on the social, political, and cultural capital of the neighborhoods left behind after public schools are closed in their area?



3)    Drawing from your own personal and professional experience respond to or expound upon one of the topics either in this post or from the the video sent to us by Dr Vang http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04CaLMODRuM

4 comments:

  1. Randy and Matt,

    Thanks for getting us started on this discussion. I think that you have provided a nice summary of the talk. I also appreciate your willingness to be the first to post to the Blog.

    I wanted to respond to your second question. I thought that Dr. Vang made a compelling case that the financial resources of the Detroit Public School system had been stripped from the community by external groups. What I was left wondering was are these the only resources that were stripped from the community. I think that a case could be made that the the chartering movement, and the external control of the curriculum as well as other external non-school based pressures have also worked to strip some of the social and cultural capital from the communities. I raise this point as a question not as a statement. I think that this would be an area of scholarship worth exploring.

    I also thought that the presentation with the students from the Baltimore Algebra Project demonstrated that the process of organizing and advocating for more equitable just schools has a positive impact on the individual students. Trey, Tim, and Jamal were examples of the benefit of engaging students. What I wanted to know more about was what was the impact on the community. Can organizing around the community school be a source of community reengagement and community revitalization? By advocating for schools can communities reclaim their own space and their own cultural, social, and financial capital?

    Again, thanks for starting the conversation. I look forward to hearing more voices.

    Chris-

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you Matt and Randy for the post. I did not get to attend Dr. Vang's discussion, but I just watched the video attachment and it was powerful. I think it demonstrates, as well as the summary you provided above, that many significant changes start from the bottom up or "grassroots movements." If we think back into historical events, we can link significant movements to small, central starting points. Within our own school districts, even if in the suburban districts, decisions that have made an impact often start with students or parents protesting what they want for their schools. For example, when cutting extra curricular activities, our district had a strong parent bottom-up movement that made its way to the decision makers. On a larger scale, we know that it is very difficult for teachers and students to relate to decisions made from those higher up, many of whom are not affiliated with education. This is very true during this past election year. As educators, and future decision makers, we need to be aware of the power of bottom-up movements of change and realize that if the people cannot relate, then there will not be a common-understanding in decisions themselves or why they are made.

    Thank you for sharing the video. I was moved and look forward to meeting Dr. Vanh on another occasion to hear her thoughts on this and many other issues.

    Tina

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dr. Vang, I apologize for the typo in your name above. I am also getting used to the blogsite and am not sure if I can edit a posted comment on here.

      Delete
  3. I was fortunate to attend Dr. Vang's talk which I found to be very provocative. She provided us with a lot of food for thought. I was particularly struck by the students who participated as well by phone.
    I think that the case of Detroit is not unusual given the politics that has dominated the city for the past twenty (or perhaps more) years. I'm still thinking about all of this and welcome the discussion. Perhaps I'll check back in later this week.

    ReplyDelete